Eurofound's EU PolicyWatch collates information on the responses of government and social partners to the COVID-19 crisis, the war in Ukraine, rising inflation, as well as gathering examples of company practices aimed at mitigating the social and economic impacts.
Factsheet for measure PT-2020-31/1281 – Updated – measures in Portugal
|Country||Portugal , applies nationwide|
|Time period||Temporary, 01 August 2020 – 30 June 2021|
|Type||Legislations or other statutory regulations|
Promoting the economic, labour market and social recovery
– Active labour market policies (enhancing employability, training, subsidised job creation, etc.)
|Author||Heloisa Perista and Maria da Paz Campos Lima (CESIS) and Eurofound|
|Measure added||15 October 2020 (updated 17 November 2021)|
Under the scope of the Economic and Social Stabilisation Programme approved by the Resolution of the Council of Ministers 41/2020 of 6 of June, the Decree-Law 46-A/2020 of 30 July creates extraordinary support for the progressive recovery of companies in a situation of business crisis, for the temporary reduction of the normal working time, with a view to maintaining employment. This extraordinary support applies to employers of a private nature, including those in the social sector, who have been affected by the COVID-19 disease pandemic and who are, as a result, in a business crisis situation.
The extraordinary support for the progressive recovery of companies in a situation of business crisis with temporary reduction of the normal working time is cumulative with a training plan approved by the Institute for Employment and Vocational Training (Instituto do Emprego e Formação Profissional, I. P. - IEFP, I. P.). (Decree-Law 46-A/2020, article 10) This training plan confers the right to a grant with the amount of 30% of the Social Support Index (the full amount of this index is €438.81 in 2020) per worker. This grant is supported by IEFP, I.P. and is aimed to the employer and to the worker in equal parts.
The training should be organised by the IEFP, I.P. and may be run remotely, whenever possible and allowed by the circumstances.
It should contribute to the improvement of the professional competences of the workers, whenever possible increasing their qualification level, and contribute to the improvement of the competitiveness of the company.
The training must correspond to the qualification modalities foreseen in the Qualifications National System.
Also, it should be implemented out of the schedule of actual provision of work, provided that within the normal working time.
The operationalisation of the training plan should be ensured by the following training bodies: the centres for employment and vocational training from the IEFP, I. P. network; and accredited training bodies or organisations that are exempt from certification as training body, if a cooperation agreement is celebrated with IEFP, I. P. Furthermore, the trade union confederations represented at the Standing Committee for Social Concertation or their sectoral or regional associates may act as training providers, if they are accredited as training bodies and a cooperation agreement is celebrated with IEFP, I. P.
According to the report by Mamede and Silva (coord.) (2021), O Estado da Nação e as Políticas Públicas 2021 - Governar em Estado de Emergência, the (simplifed) layoff protected employment in the short-term but did not take advantage of the opportunity for training. Between March and July 2020, 1.25% of the workers covered by lay-off were included in training plans, corresponding to 342 (0.3%) of the 113,000 businesses that made use of the lay-off measure.
Employees in standard employment
||Applies to all businesses||Does not apply to citizens|
Company / Companies
Social partners' role in designing the measure and form of involvement:
|Trade unions||Employers' organisations|
|Form||Consultation through tripartite or bipartite social dialogue bodies||Consultation through tripartite or bipartite social dialogue bodies|
Social partners' role in the implementation, monitoring and assessment phase:
The trade union confederations CGTP and UGT and the four employer confederations CIP, CAP, CCP and CTP represented at the tripartite Standing Committee for Social Concertation have been consulted.
Also the measures provided for in this decree-law will be subject to regular assessment by the Standing Committee for Social Concertation (article 18).
Furthermore, the trade union confederations represented at the Standing Committee for Social Concertation or their sectoral or regional associates may act as training providers, if they are accredited as training bodies and a cooperation agreement is celebrated with IEFP, I. P. (article 10 - paragraph 6).
According to information released by the Público newspaper, on 19 February 2021, the social partners express criticism on the measure, although in different ways.
Employers and trade unions agree on one idea: adherence to the training measures was very low given the major economic downturn.
The employers' confederations, namely the Confederation of Portuguese Tourism (CTP) and the Confederation of Portuguese Business (CIP), point out flaws in the model, recognising that it was a measure relegated to a second plan, compared to the measures of simplified layoff or extraordinary support to the progressive resumption of activity; because it lacked disclosure; there was too much bureaucracy; and the concern of managers was primarily to ensure the survival and maintain jobs.
The unions say that this was a lost opportunity, when there were hundreds of thousands of workers out of work, especially in the first phase of the pandemic.
The General Confederation of Portuguese Workers (CGTP-IN) highlights the very low interest that companies showed in using downtime to retrain, reinforce and create skills among workers. This lack of interest will have been enhanced by the Government's choice not to establish a mandatory connection between training and layoff.
The General Workers Union (UGT) recognises that there was indeed a lack of interest from companies, but states that it is not legitimate to evaluate the result without taking into account the extraordinary circumstances generated by the pandemic. There were simpler and more immediate measures. It also notes that companies and workers had few conditions to reflect and plan a type of training that was adequate to the pandemic situation.
Eurofound (2020), Training plan for companies with temporary reduction of the normal period of working time, measure PT-2020-31/1281 (measures in Portugal), EU PolicyWatch, Dublin, https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/PT-2020-31_1281.html
19 May 2022
This publication consists of individual country reports on working life during 2021 for 28 countries (the 27 EU Member States and Norway).Publication
24 June 2020
COVID-19: Policy responses across Europe
This report aims to present an overview of both large-scale government measures and collective agreements that impact on large groups of workers.
16 June 2022
Throughout 2021, the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, specific occupational health and safety rules were reintroduced due to increases in infection rates.Article
16 June 2022
Back to work after COVID-19: Testing, vaccines and green certificates
In the second pandemic year 2021, access to one's place of work was increasingly dependent on providing proof of either having been tested, vaccinated or recovered from COVID-19 in several countries.
Disclaimer: This information has not been subject to the full Eurofound evaluation, editorial and publication process.