Eurofound's EU PolicyWatch collates information on the responses of government and social partners to the COVID-19 crisis, the war in Ukraine, rising inflation, as well as gathering examples of company practices aimed at mitigating the social and economic impacts.
Factsheet for measure HU-2012-1/2651 – measures in Hungary
Country | Hungary , applies nationwide |
Time period | Open ended, started on 06 January 2012 |
Context | Restructuring Support Instruments |
Type | Legislations or other statutory regulations |
Category |
Protection of workers, adaptation of workplace
– Changes of working hours or work arrangements |
Author | Nóra Krokovay (KOPINT-Tárki) and Eurofound |
Measure added | 23 June 2022 (updated 10 November 2022) |
This instrument was introduced in 2012 and is available to all employers. The explanatory ministerial note that came with the new labour code characterises employee sharing as a special form of part-time work, where an employee performs the same job for multiple employers – as set down in Article 195 of the Labour Code. More specifically, this means that only one job profile is provided in an employment contract, and all employers can request tasks that fit within the framework of that job specification, but not beyond it. Although Section 8 of Act CL of 2017 on Taxation slightly modified the wording of the Act, the essence has not changed.
The concept of employee sharing is based on an employment contract signed by one employee and two or more employers. Hence there is one employment relationship between the parties concerned and the employee works for all the employers.
The parties might specify for which employer the employee should work during specific hours of the working day. Such a setting is considered part-time work from the employer's point of view, as none of the employees count as a full-time employee.
Unlike agency work, employee sharing is not about transferring employers' rights to an outside party for profit, but involves two or more employers right from the beginning. Any employer may give orders to the shared employees, but cannot request all of their time. Moreover, the employee should not be requested to work more hours than a standard full-time employee. The employers may conclude an agreement among themselves specifying their respective rights and obligations regarding the shared employees (Kozma, 2012).
On the other hand, the employers must officially assign the obligations concerning the payment of wages, taxes and social security contributions to one among them, and they need to inform the employee about the choice.
It is a marginal, but growing form of employment in Hungary. In 2012 there were only 54 cases where employees were shared, and their number reached nearly 14,000 in 2015. They constituted 0.12% of all Hungarian employees in 2015. No new data about the use of this employment form is available. Employee sharing is mostly established by members of groups of companies that organise their work in a uniform way, not at the level of individual companies, but at the level of company groups.
Advantages include flexibility: the regulation enables the parties involved to design the employee-sharing scheme according to their own needs – it may be used for ad-hoc employment for a joint project or for creating a more permanent employee-sharing structure. Employers can share payment, tax and social security obligations among them as they see fit, and the arrangement decreases the administrative burden compared with other legal options used for shared employment, for example when each employer in parallel conducts a part-time employment contract with the same employee.
Shortcomings include under regulation: the law gives only rough definitions for the specifics, while in practice, more boundaries should be set. Thus, there is some vulnerability to abuse. The lack of financial details and the need for constant coordination makes employers reluctant to enlist for employee-employment. It may also have a negative effect on employee benefits. While in principle the level of benefits is the same, in terms of employers paying the same as when paying wages, the jointly employed worker could be disfavoured compared with other workers.
Workers | Businesses | Citizens |
---|---|---|
Employees in standard employment
|
Applies to all businesses | Does not apply to citizens |
Actors | Funding |
---|---|
National government
|
Employer
|
Social partners' role in designing the measure and form of involvement:
Trade unions | Employers' organisations | |
---|---|---|
Role | Unknown | Unknown |
Form | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Social partners' role in the implementation, monitoring and assessment phase:
Unknown
Unknown
Citation
Eurofound (2022), Employee sharing, measure HU-2012-1/2651 (measures in Hungary), EU PolicyWatch, Dublin, https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/HU-2012-1_2651.html
Share
30 January 2023
Governments across the EU continue to implement policies to support citizens and businesses in the face of rising food and energy prices caused by the COVID-19 crisis and intensified by the war in Ukraine. This article summarises the policy responses as reported in Eurofound's EU PolicyWatch database from January to September 2022.
Article12 September 2022
Although the worldwide pandemic situation had already disrupted supply chains and triggered increases in energy and food prices in 2021, the situation deteriorated in 2022 with the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Article12 September 2022
This article summarises the first policy responses that governments across the EU have started to implement to support companies affected by the rising prices, and those with commercial ties to Ukraine, Russia or Belarus.
Article5 July 2022
This article summarises the first policy responses of EU Member States, including those of the social partners and other civil society actors, enabling refugees to exercise their rights under the Temporary Protection Directive.
ArticleDisclaimer: This information has not been subject to the full Eurofound evaluation, editorial and publication process.