Eurofound's EU PolicyWatch collates information on the responses of government and social partners to the COVID-19 crisis, the war in Ukraine, rising inflation, as well as gathering examples of company practices aimed at mitigating the social and economic impacts.
Factsheet for measure FR-2020-13/1028 – Updated – measures in France
Country | France , applies nationwide |
Time period | Temporary, 25 March 2020 – 10 October 2020 |
Context | COVID-19 |
Type | Legislations or other statutory regulations |
Category |
Protection of workers, adaptation of workplace
– Changes in work organisation |
Author | Frédéric Turlan (IRshare) and Eurofound |
Measure added | 03 August 2020 (updated 20 January 2022) |
In order to deal with the consequences of the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, several orders have modified the time limits for various social proceedings. Thus, the deadlines for concluding collective agreements have been reduced until 10 October 2020, since the purpose of these agreements is to deal with the economic, financial and social consequences of the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic.
In order to ensure that companies act quickly to deal with the consequences of the COVID-19 epidemic, Ordinance No. 2020-306 of 25 March 2020, as amended by Ordinance No. 18044 of 17 April 2020, reduced the legal deadlines for collective bargaining for so-called "COVID-19" agreements, i.e. those concluded to deal with the economic, financial and social consequences of the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic as well as the consequences of the measures taken to limit this spread. This provision covered agreements concluded up to 24 June.
A new Ordinance of 17 June 2020 extends this time reduction measure to COVID-19 agreements concluded up to 10 October 2020.
However, an exception is made for the provision reducing the minimum period from 15 to 5 days for organising staff consultation on a draft employer's agreement in companies with fewer than 11 employees without a trade union delegate. This measure will be repealed from 11 August 2020.
On the other hand, for agreements concluded until 10 October 2020, the period will remain reduced to:
The Ministry of Labour has also published a questions-answers circular to clarify the use of visioconference, audioconference and electronic signature in the framework of collective bargaining to ease the negotiation process during the COVID-19 crisis.
The following updates to this measure have been made after it came into effect.
07 October 2021 |
The Jean Jaures Foundation has published a study based on 122 responses from employee representatives and management to a questionnaire posted online between April and June 2021, seven monographs of establishments and five interviews with key witnesses from the world of management, trade unions and the administration (see Source). For the authors of the study, "e-social dialogue seems to be able to continue after the crisis provided that it is linked to face-to-face meetings in order to create and maintain the link between all the players in social dialogue". But in the end, it is the question of proximity (between employees and their elected representatives, between central and site representatives) that e-social dialogue and telework raise. "The health crisis has highlighted the need for a social dialogue close to the employees", the authors note. One of the challenges of modern social dialogue will be to combine the new forms of work organisation and social dialogue with this necessary proximity, they conclude. |
01 September 2021 |
Although in 2020 the number of company collective agreements fell slightly compared to the previous year, more than 10,000 texts were related to the COVID-19 health crisis, according to the ministry of Labour (DARES). The largest number concerns working time. ‘In 2020, 10,760 texts concluded at company level, 76% of which were agreements and amendments, related to the COVID-19 health crisis. This represents 13.5% of the texts recorded between March and December’, states the DARES in its study published on 1 September 2021 (see Sources). More specifically, 84% were concluded in the period from March to July 2020, with a significant peak in April. 34% (i.e. 3,600) were concluded by companies with less than 50 employees and 21% (i.e. 2,210) by companies with less than 21 employees. The “COVID agreements” mainly deal with the setting of holidays. |
08 July 2021 |
According to the Annual Review of Collective Bargaining 2020, published on 8 July 2021 by the Ministry of Labour, 'social dialogue has been a real "lever for responding to the health crisis' (see source section). Social dialogue also played a key role in managing the crisis. With more than 70 branch-level agreements concluded specifically to deal with the consequences of the COVID-19 epidemic, 49 branch-level agreements on long-term short-working time scheme (APLD) and more than 10,000 company-level agreements, collective bargaining was a powerful lever for facilitating the management of the health crisis and its consequences on work organisation and employment. Thus, while it could have been feared that the health crisis would lead to a confinement of social dialogue, quite the opposite occurred'. |
As of 2 July 2020, according to data provided by the Ministry of Labour (DGT), 30 branch-level agreements and 6,848 company-level agreements have been concluded to address the COVID-19 crisis. As of 25 June, the number of company agreements was 5,700, of which 3,000 were signed with trade union delegates; more than 1,000 with a staff representative or an employee mandated by a trade union: more than 1,100 with an elected or non-mandated employee and nearly 500 directly with employees on the basis of an agreement approved by at least two-thirds of the employees.
As in the case of branch agreements, company agreements mainly concern the taking of paid leaves and days of working time reduction, but also the use or not of short-time working with salary maintenance, the payment of an exceptional bonus provided for by the government for employees who continued to work during the health crisis, and the organisation of work.
Workers | Businesses | Citizens |
---|---|---|
Employees in standard employment
Workers in non-standard forms of employment |
Applies to all businesses | Does not apply to citizens |
Actors | Funding |
---|---|
National government
|
No special funding required
|
Social partners' role in designing the measure and form of involvement:
Trade unions | Employers' organisations | |
---|---|---|
Role | Informed | Informed |
Form | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Social partners' role in the implementation, monitoring and assessment phase:
Social partners have not been formally consulted, but some of them have been informally consulted.
Globally social partners have supported the measures aiming to facilitate collective bargaining on COVID-19 issues. The high number of collective agreements signed prove that these measures have supported the social dialogue within companies.
Citation
Eurofound (2020), Adaptation of collective bargaining rules, measure FR-2020-13/1028 (measures in France), EU PolicyWatch, Dublin, https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/FR-2020-13_1028.html
Share
30 January 2023
Governments across the EU continue to implement policies to support citizens and businesses in the face of rising food and energy prices caused by the COVID-19 crisis and intensified by the war in Ukraine. This article summarises the policy responses as reported in Eurofound's EU PolicyWatch database from January to September 2022.
Article12 September 2022
Although the worldwide pandemic situation had already disrupted supply chains and triggered increases in energy and food prices in 2021, the situation deteriorated in 2022 with the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Article12 September 2022
This article summarises the first policy responses that governments across the EU have started to implement to support companies affected by the rising prices, and those with commercial ties to Ukraine, Russia or Belarus.
Article5 July 2022
This article summarises the first policy responses of EU Member States, including those of the social partners and other civil society actors, enabling refugees to exercise their rights under the Temporary Protection Directive.
ArticleDisclaimer: This information has not been subject to the full Eurofound evaluation, editorial and publication process.