Eurofound's EU PolicyWatch collates information on the responses of government and social partners to the COVID-19 crisis, the war in Ukraine, rising inflation, as well as gathering examples of company practices aimed at mitigating the social and economic impacts.
Factsheet for measure EE-2024-42/3676 – measures in Estonia
| Country | Estonia , applies nationwide |
| Time period | Open ended, started on 16 October 2024 |
| Context | Green Transition |
| Type | Non-binding recommendations or other texts |
| Category |
Promoting the economic, labour market and social recovery into a green future
– Other |
| Author | Miriam Lehari (Praxis Think Tank) |
| Measure added | 18 December 2024 (updated 09 June 2025) |
Estonia is in the process of drafting the Climate-Resilient Economy Act, commonly referred to as the climate law, which aims to guide the country toward climate neutrality by 2050. The Ministry of Climate began drafting this legislation in early 2024, with initial outlines presented on May 8, 2024.
Social partners are consulted on the drafts of the Act. Employers Confederation, peak level social partner, has provided their positions in writing and has assembled a working group to provide feedback on the drafts.
The Estonian Employers' Confederation opposes the Climate Law because it believes the draft lacks clarity and fails to provide the legal certainty necessary for sustainable business operations and investment security. Kai Realo, head of the confederation’s council, stated that while businesses support sustainability, the draft does not address how climate goals will be achieved without jeopardizing export competitiveness, employment, incomes, or causing a socioeconomic crisis.
Key concerns include:
Insufficient clarity and coordination: The implementation provisions, alignment with other laws, and societal agreements are unclear or incomplete. Lack of impact assessment: The socioeconomic effects on various sectors and society as a whole have not been adequately evaluated. Premature consultation: Opinions were sought from stakeholders before clarity was reached on critical issues, such as the national energy plan and forestry and land-use regulations. Regulatory uncertainty: It is unclear how the government plans to regulate businesses to meet climate targets.
The confederation argues that this approach contradicts the government’s objective to enhance economic competitiveness, which requires legal certainty and clarity.
Not applicable.
| Workers | Businesses | Citizens |
|---|---|---|
| Does not apply to workers | Applies to all businesses | Does not apply to citizens |
| Actors | Funding |
|---|---|
|
Employers' organisations
|
No special funding required
|
Social partners' role in designing the measure and form of involvement:
| Trade unions | Employers' organisations | |
|---|---|---|
| Role | Unknown | Agreed (outcome) incl. social partner initiative |
| Form | Not applicable | Any other form of consultation, institutionalised (as stable working groups or committees) or informal |
Social partners' role in the implementation, monitoring and assessment phase:
This is a view of the Employers Organisation.
This is a view of the Employers Organisation.
Citation
Eurofound (2024), Employers' Confederation opposes Climate-Resilient Economy Act, measure EE-2024-42/3676 (measures in Estonia), EU PolicyWatch, Dublin, https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/EE-2024-42_3676.html
Share
Disclaimer: This information has not been subject to the full Eurofound evaluation, editorial and publication process.